top of page

How to Fix Capitalism

  • Writer: Bridget Sullivan Mermel CFP(R) CPA
    Bridget Sullivan Mermel CFP(R) CPA
  • Dec 11, 2012
  • 2 min read

Don’t get me wrong, there’s a lot to love about Adam Smith. Each person acts in his or her own self-interest in a free market…what’s not to love?


Well, take my industry, financial advising, for example.


Most advisors know a lot about financial products than the person purchasing their services or products.


Often, the client is not in a position to evaluate the quality of what they are buying. They rely on the advisor, who might be serving their own interests, not the clients. Insurance companies in particular create life insurance products that are too complex for even other advisors to understand.


This basic conflict of interest is one of the elements at the heart of the 2008 market collapse. If mortgage brokers were required to sell people products in their best interest would the economic collapse have happened? I sincerely doubt it.


Two countries, Australia and the U.K., are now mandating that financial advisors stop charging commission. They are requiring advisors to operate in their client’s best interest. The U.S. is considering this, but we’re very far away, because a lot of big companies make a lot of money by conforming to a lower standard. A small part of the industry, which I proudly belong to, operates with a “fiduciary” standard, which means putting the client’s interest ahead of our own.


That got me thinking; what if we changed capitalism? What if we required that when someone sold us something, it be in the customer’s best interest as far as the seller knew? What if most companies offered the lifetime warranties that a few companies do now? You could return any product at any time because you were unhappy with it.


As far as I know, it’s a radical idea!


I know a lot of people are going to say, Bridget, what are you trying to do, put Twinkies out of business? I mean who could sell Twinkies under that system? Wait! They’re already out of business.


Sure, this would change our legal code. Yes, there are a lot of practicalities to work out. But isn’t it worth considering and debating ideas that might improve the world?


Attorneys, CPAs, and doctors already have this standard of care. Why not the rest of capitalism? Why not shift the responsibility to the seller? That way if they know they have a product that isn’t in the customer’s best interest, it would be their responsibility if they sell it, not the buyer’s responsibility to buy it.

 
 
 

Comments


Call or email us.
We'd love the opportunity to connect.

The first thing we do when you contact us is simply find out a little bit more about you and the issues that you're facing. While we’ll ask you about your finances, all of our conversations and your information is private and confidential.

Sullivan Mermel, Inc.

3744 N. Southport Unit G

Chicago, IL 60613

Email: b@sullivanmermel.com
Ph: 773-404-9344
Fax: 773-327-1461

© 2024 Bridget Sullivan Mermel

  • YouTube
  • Black LinkedIn Icon
bottom of page